The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Bonus: Privacy Guarantor, no obstacles to publicity of the beneficiaries

2020-08-11T15:49:47.025Z


Investigation on the methodology followed by the institution (ANSA)" Privacy is not an obstacle to publicizing the data relating to the beneficiaries of the contribution where , as in this case, in particular, a condition of economic and social hardship of the interested party cannot be deduced". The Guarantor for the protection of personal data underlines this in relation to the Covid bonus affair. This is even more true than those who perform a "public function...


" Privacy is not an obstacle to publicizing the data relating to the beneficiaries of the contribution where , as in this case, in particular, a condition of economic and social hardship of the interested party cannot be deduced". The Guarantor for the protection of personal data underlines this in relation to the Covid bonus affair. This is even more true than those who perform a "public function", adds the Guarantor, who will open an investigation on the methodology followed by INPS.

"In relation to the Covid bonus issue, the Guarantor for the protection of personal data - reads a note released by the Authority - specifies that, on the basis of current legislation, privacy is not an obstacle to the publicity of data relating to beneficiaries of the contribution where, as in this case, it is not possible to deduce, in particular, a condition of economic and social hardship of the interested party (art. 26, paragraph 4, legislative decree 33 of 2013) ". "This is all the more true with respect to those for whom, due to the public function performed, the expectations of confidentiality are weakened - explains the Guarantor - also due to the more incisive disclosure obligations of the patrimonial condition to which they are subject (cf. ., for example, articles 9 of Law 441/1982 and 5 of Legislative Decree 149/2013, converted, with amendments, by Law no. 13 of 2014) ". At the same time, the Guarantor communicates that "an investigation will be opened in relation to the methodology followed by the INPS with respect to the processing of the data of the beneficiaries and the information disseminated in this regard".

"As promised, if someone takes a bonus they will be suspended, even if that money was given to charity." This was declared by the group leader in the Chamber Riccardo Molinari. 

Former challenger Nardella, got bonus to give him to charity  - Even Ubaldo Bocci, coordinator of the center-right in Palazzo Vecchio who in 2019 challenged Dario Nardella in the race for mayor of Florence, asked for, and received, the bonus for professionals in difficulty due to Covid emergency. Bocci, a former Azimut executive, as local newspapers report today, explains that he has no financial problems but that he did so "to prove that the government was wrong by not giving ad hoc money to disabled and drug addicts" and that he "gave everything to charity. ". "It 's true I took that money but I did not keep it for myself - adds Bocci -. The accountant told me that I could have it too since it was a matter of money, given in a very wrong way, without distinguishing income and position of each. And then I thought that I could ask for them to give them to those who really needed them. And so I did ". "I have the bank transfers that prove it - he concludes -. I also declared it in a meeting of the group leaders in Palazzo Vecchio".

Source: ansa

All life articles on 2020-08-11

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.