The maneuver remains stuck in the Senate, with the votes in the Commission slipping once again and will not begin until Monday. A week after Christmas, the parliamentarians have not had the opportunity to examine even one amendment and to cast even one vote, a more unique than rare circumstance in the process of the budget law. So much so that the hypothesis of arriving directly in the Chamber with the maxi-amendment without having given a mandate to the rapporteur even hints at it. Work is still continuing on the reformulations, especially as regards the changes to the Superbonus, which the speakers are negotiating directly with the Ministry of Economy, in charge of ascertaining the coverage. The meetings at the Mef will continue on Sunday as well, to try to make up for the abolition of the Isee roof for the villas,as all the forces of the majority demand. The 110%, on which there has been a political agreement for days, is the last obstacle to overcome but it is also the highest.
The majority agrees on the abolition of all restrictions, starting from the Isee roof, with the sole obligation to carry out at least 30% of the works by June. But there is still uncertainty about the extension of photovoltaic incentives and the increase in the mobile bonus from 5 thousand to 10 thousand euros. The covers will be found within the 600 million euros foreseen for the parliamentary changes and achieving a balance is not easy. Instead, the question of the new tax bills seems closed: with the center-right continuing to ask for an extension, we are moving towards an extension of payments to 180 days for those that will arrive from 1 January. After the 'omnibus' amendment presented by the Government, which introduces the cut of Irpef and Irap, the installment of bills,rewrites the patent box and refinances the TV bonus, the expected one on business relocations has also officially arrived. The Deputy Minister of Economic Development, Alessandra Todde, defends the intervention that avoids 'wild' relocations, criticized by those who consider it too restrictive. For Todde, the law, which doubles the sanctions for those who violate the rules, "does not want to be punitive" and "does not want to chain businesses in any way", because "they have every right to do business, to restructure or even to close" . The goal is to push companies towards "social responsibility" and avoid "productive desertification".Deputy Minister of Economic Development, Alessandra Todde, defends the intervention that avoids 'wild' relocations, criticized by those who consider it too restrictive. For Todde, the law, which doubles the sanctions for those who violate the rules, "does not want to be punitive" and "does not want to chain businesses in any way", because "they have every right to do business, to restructure or even to close" . The goal is to push companies towards "social responsibility" and avoid "productive desertification".Deputy Minister of Economic Development, Alessandra Todde, defends the intervention that avoids 'wild' relocations, criticized by those who consider it too restrictive. For Todde, the law, which doubles the sanctions for those who violate the rules, "does not want to be punitive" and "does not want to chain businesses in any way", because "they have every right to do business, to restructure or even to close" . The goal is to push companies towards "social responsibility" and avoid "productive desertification".and "does not want to chain businesses in any way", because "they have every right to do business, to restructure or even to close down". The goal is to push companies towards "social responsibility" and avoid "productive desertification".and "does not want to chain businesses in any way", because "they have every right to do business, to restructure or even to close down". The goal is to push companies towards "social responsibility" and avoid "productive desertification".
